STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTION -- SPRING 2002
INSTRUCTOR: JOE ESCOBAR
COURSE NAME: History of the United States
COURSE NUM: HST203
REGISTR. NUM: 40896
DEPT: Social Science
CLASS DAY & TIME: TT10A
| STRONGLY AGREE |
AGREE | DISAGREE | STRONGLY DISAGREE |
DOESN'T APPLY |
AVG. | RESPONSE TOTAL |
||
| Q#1 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 | 18 | 1. What was taught agreed with the objectives stated in the catalog or course outline. |
| Q#2 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 | 18 | 2. The instructor exhibited an enthusiasm and interest in the subject. |
| Q#3 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 | 18 | 3. The instructor was knowledgeable in the subject. |
| Q#4 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 18 | 4. The instructor used class time effectively. |
| Q#5 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 | 18 | 5. Respected diff. genders, religions, ethnic backgrounds, class status, abilities and lifestyles. |
| Q#6 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1.4 | 18 | 6. The instructor encouraged students to think. |
| Q#7 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 18 | 7. The instructor's teaching methods were effective in helping me learn the material. |
| Q#8 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 | 18 | 8. The instructor made an effort to be available to students. |
| Q#9 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 | 18 | 9. Helped students understand the course material and find answers to relevant questions. |
| Q#10 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 18 | 10. The instructor was fair and reasonable. |
| Q#11 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 | 18 | 11. The instructor helped me believe I could achieve my potential in this course. |
| Q#12 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 18 | 22. Overall, the instructor was effective. Consider both limitations and possibilities... |
Student Comments
| What did you like about the class? | How could this class be improved? Add any comments about the class and/or the instructor that you feel might he helpful or useful. |
| I like the straight forward approach to the course. I think he is a reasonable person and I appreciate that he stay on schedule. | He seems just a little bit too liveral and it shows in his class room. He should also be careful about commenting on religious topics. I'm a Christian and I hope the President prays before he acts. |
| I truly can say this is one of the best taught history classes. Lectures are superb, online tests are convenient, and the PSD reading is great to get a closer look at history. Video clip usage is great! Overall this class taught me a ton and did it in a very manageable timely manner. | There's too much history and too little time. |
| I liked the overheads and videos and Escobar gave lots of wonderful info on certain things especially studying WWI. | Escobar made comments that didn't always make sense like women in Iran cover their faces as a political protest to America (which has nothing to do with what we are studying). He referred to Jimmy Carter as a fluke president which is insane because he was one of the best presidents we have had recently (peace between Israel and Palestine). His tests were all t/f and multiple choice so no, I don't think I was encouraged to think. |
| The information covered. | The lighting in the computer room is terrible. It is hard to see those old screen when the natural light is fading in and out. If we are going to be required to take the tests on computers (which I think is a great idea) the environment must be reasonable. |
| Everything, Joe is so enthusiastic, funny & knowledgeable you don't want to miss class. | The class is perfect as is. Great job! |
| Overall it was a good learning experience. | I think the instructors could make his notes easier to copy down. At times they were confusing. |
| Every day there was a video. That helped put things in perspective. | |
| It was fun. | |
| The videos/the organization/having a website to go to | |
| It was so interesting to learn more about U.S. history so I can be a more informed person. | NA |
| Joe's enthusiasm really makes the class interesting. | More handouts to answers questions on videos. |
| Good lectures. | |
| Excellent coverage of material, good presentation | |
| He was clear about what was expected. I liked that diverse methods of teaching - videos, charts, outlines, and lecture. | Change nothing - It's the best history class I've ever had. Give him a raise! |
STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTION -- SPRING 2002
INSTRUCTOR: JOE ESCOBAR
COURSE NAME: History of the United States
COURSE NUM: HST203
REGISTR. NUM: 40897
DEPT: Social Science
CLASS DAY & TIME: TT1P
| STRONGLY AGREE |
AGREE | DISAGREE | STRONGLY DISAGREE |
DOESN'T APPLY |
AVG. | RESPONSE TOTAL |
||
| Q#1 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 | 22 | 1. What was taught agreed with the objectives stated in the catalog or course outline. |
| Q#2 | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 | 22 | 2. The instructor exhibited an enthusiasm and interest in the subject. |
| Q#3 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 | 22 | 3. The instructor was knowledgeable in the subject. |
| Q#4 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 | 22 | 4. The instructor used class time effectively. |
| Q#5 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1.3 | 22 | 5. Respected diff. genders, religions, ethnic backgrounds, class status, abilities and lifestyles. |
| Q#6 | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 | 22 | 6. The instructor encouraged students to think. |
| Q#7 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 | 22 | 7. The instructor's teaching methods were effective in helping me learn the material. |
| Q#8 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 | 22 | 8. The instructor made an effort to be available to students. |
| Q#9 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 22 | 9. Helped students understand the course material and find answers to relevant questions. |
| Q#10 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 22 | 10. The instructor was fair and reasonable. |
| Q#11 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 22 | 11. The instructor helped me believe I could achieve my potential in this course. |
| Q#22 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 22 | 22. Overall, the instructor was effective. Consider both limitations and possibilities. |
Student Comments
| What did you like about the class? | How could this class be improved? Add any comments about the class and/or the instructor that you feel might he helpful or useful. |
| Escobar knows alot about history. | It can't be improved |
| Everything! Great teaching. | |
| I appreciated how Escobar would compare all historical events with relevant history so that the archaic past became personal. | Perhaps make the tight late work policies more lenient and have some class notes posted on the internet. |
| He presents material well. | |
| I learned a lot. Escobar was very knowledgeable and gave a lot of good info. Good teaching style. | None |
| Escobar's enthusiasm and knowledge | The tests were too difficult... maybe have 4 smaller ones instead of two large ones? |
| The teacher really knows his history and is very fun to listen to. | The only thing I didn't like was the classroom - but that's not his fault. Classroom was way to dark and depressing. |
| I love the computer system - the flexibility of the exams - the weekly computer quizzes. And the instructor - his methods helped me see the big picture of history. | |
| Availability of teacher. | It's perfect. |
| He is a great teacher and knows what he is teaching. Not only does he have the knowledge, but enjoys what he teaches. | None |
| The time period covered, scope of information presented, both foreign and domestic. | Have novels relating to time period to read for class. |
| Escobar made the class interesting and enjoyable! | Everything was fantastic! |
| Joe Escobar's love of subject. |