TEXT:
This course
uses Open Educational Resources (OERs); there is no
book to purchase. The text, Ethics: An Introduction to
Moral Philosophy by the instructor, is embedded in
the online Moodle class.
IMPORTANT: There is a quiz on the syllabus DUE
SATURDAY OF THE FIRST WEEK by 11:59pm.
If
you don't take the Syllabus Quiz by the deadline, you may
be DROPPED from the course for non-participation.
Try to take this quiz early so you don't miss the deadline.
If you decide this class is not for you, please drop right
away on
MyLane as
there is no
guarantee you will be dropped by the
instructor. This will also help out students on the wait
list who would like to add and get started with the class.
If
you don't drop by SUNDAY OF THE FIRST WEEK, you
will be charged for the class. If you drop the class
after the 4th week, the class will be recorded on your
transcript with a "W" (withdrawn) next to it.
The
absolute last day to drop or change
your grading option to pass/no pass is
Friday of the 8th week at 11:59pm.
CONTACTING THE INSTRUCTOR: Please
use Moodle messages to contact me. I
will do my best to reply within 24 hours. You may
receive a notification and copy of Moodle messages in your
email. Please don't reply to those directly; log
into Moodle and reply there. Using
Moodle messages consistently also allows us to track
any ongoing issues by scrolling up in the message
history. Replying
to email notifications or using email to contact me
will result in a delayed response and
the 24 hour rule will not apply. My students
come first; using Moodle for communication
will ensure your message gets the priority treatment
it deserves. Before contacting me, please review this
syllabus and and the Announcements Forum to see if
your question is already answered there.
THIS IS AN ADULT
LEARNING SPACE: Expect to come into contact with ideas
with which you disagree and to have your beliefs challenged.
Students will be treated as mature, responsible adults,
capable of engaging in adult conversations which may touch on
topics such as race, sex, gender, sexual orientation, sexual
relations, cultural differences, morality, politics and
religion.
It is a prerequisite of this course that you
possess, or be willing to develop, the ability to discuss
controversial issues in a calm, rational and respectful
manner.
TRIGGER WARNING: Examples used in the readings
and in class may reference war, nuclear weapons, biological
weapons, terrorism, genocide, slavery, serial killers,
cannibalism, human sacrifice, murder, torture,
FGM
(female genital mutilation), rape, sexual harassment,
sexual infidelity, sexual promiscuity, abortion, addiction,
suicide, drowning children, starving children, children hit by
trains and college students killed for their organs. The
purpose of these hypothetical and real life examples is not to
be lurid but to clearly illustrate moral principles with the
stark realities of human experience. Ethical theory would
otherwise be about meaningless abstractions or petty
bourgeois
problems. Also, "extreme" cases give us examples of morally
bad acts and outcomes about which there is nearly universal
agreement that we can use as a starting point for theorizing.
Expect such examples to come up in class regularly, along with
examples of compassion, virtue and heroism. You may also be
exposed to uncensored art nudes and a censored photo of a
congressman "caught with his pants down."
If you have difficulty handling such material, you may want
to consider taking another course. For help with
post-traumatic stress or emotional fragility, please contact
the Counseling
& Career Center. If you would like to
improve your tolerance for subject matter and ideas you may
currently find distressing or offensive, I encourage you to
remain in the class but with the understanding that
thinking
about, discussing and critically evaluating this material in
a mature and responsible manner is a course requirement.
ACADEMIC FREEDOM OF THE INSTRUCTOR: "The professional
freedom of faculty includes
the right to explore and
discuss controversial issues and divergent points of view,
including
evaluating, criticizing, and advocating their
point of view concerning the policies and programs of the
college..."-- Collective Bargaining Agreement between
the Lane Community College Educational Association and Board
of Education, Section 15.3. According to this section of the
faculty contract, the instructor is free not only to discuss
contentious, hot-button issues which have the potential to
offend you, but to approach them from viewpoints which diverge
from the mainstream and deviate from what you might consider
"acceptable" opinion. Academic freedom is essential to
fostering robust discussion of intellectual issues and the
social progress that results from such discussions. Before
reacting in knee-jerk fashion to an idea, please try to
remember that what offends our sensibilities is often a
product of our culture, mass media, upbringing, peer group and
personal history rather than any quality intrinsic to the idea
itself. Also keep in mind that these things change over time.
Many ideas that were considered dangerous, controversial or
offensive in the past are now part of the unquestioned status
quo. Your job as a thinking person is to sort feeling from
fact and to separate rationality and morality from cultural
prejudice and personal bias. This type of
self-examination
is a big part of what it means to be a
philosopher.
Faculty have wide discretion in how they treat academic
subjects in the classroom. Although this class will explore a
diversity of opinions,
some ideas will be emphasized over
others. Beliefs which enjoy institutional support from
the college may be singled out for scrutiny, as explicitly
allowed in Section 15.3 above. Ideas which predominate in
academic culture and the social sciences or among college
students may face special criticism, while
minority or
neglected viewpoints may be given special consideration.
This is because thinking critically is
most important
when it comes to beliefs you are likely to have
uncritically
adopted (or dismissed) due to various dominant social
influences.
Considerations of "balance" in this course are
approached from the institutional level. So, for
example, if the college as an institution and the majority of
courses favor or promote one view on a controversial issue,
this class may balance that out by emphasizing an opposing
view.
The instructor attempts to give the best argument for many
different views.
Just because an argument in favor of a
particular view is given in class, podcasts, the text or
other external resources does not necessarily mean that it
is the instructor's view on the subject. In fact, you
may notice that the instructor will make arguments for views
which are logically incompatible with one another. Therefore,
it makes no sense to assume that every time a view is being
presented, the instructor believes it and is attempting to
persuade you to accept it.
It is up to you to sort through
the competing claims and arguments presented in this class
and decide for yourself which views to accept.
If you disagree with or take offense at any of the views
expressed in this class by the instructor or in course
materials (1) try to keep an open mind (2) reflect on
why
you find certain beliefs or opinions vexing or upsetting and
use this as an opportunity for self-exploration, to practice
self-management skills and to develop your capacity for
tolerance of ideas which differ from your own (3) remind
yourself that emotions are an unreliable guide to objective
reality and that the feelings we associate with certain ideas
are often accidents of birth, culture and personal experience
(4) keep in mind that
exploring or
understanding
an idea isn't the same as
approving of or
accepting
it and (5) engage the instructor in civil discussion or debate
in class sessions (in the case of face-to-face classes) or
privately in office hours.
Another relevant section of the faculty contract is Section
16.3, Civic Life, which states, "
Each faculty member is
also a citizen of his or her nation, state and community;
and when he or she speaks, writes or acts as such shall be
free from institutional censorship." This means that
faculty have an absolute
right to express themselves outside the
classroom without fear of retribution from the
Administration. Therefore, if you encounter the
instructor outside the classroom, acting in his capacity as a
private citizen, you should recognize that
his views do
not necessarily represent those of the college and that
the college recognizes his right to speak, write
and act according to the truth as he sees it and the
dictates of his own conscience.
ACADEMIC FREEDOM OF STUDENTS: "Each faculty member is
entitled to and responsible for protecting freedom in the
classroom in discussion and presentation of subject matter."
-- Collective Bargaining Agreement between the Lane Community
College Educational Association and Board of Education,
Section 15.2. Voicing an opinion that differs from that
expressed by the instructor in face-to-face sessions or online
forums will never be penalized, though there may be occasions
when debate must be curtailed in the interest of adequately
covering course material.
The instructor encourages the
voicing of dissenting opinions, especially on controversial
issues and when backed by convincing reasons and supporting
evidence. This enlivens class, provides an alternative
viewpoint, fosters critical thinking and may end up
enlightening the instructor, who occasionally realizes he has
been wrong. Please couch dissenting opinions in a constructive
and respectful manner in order to keep the exchange of ideas
civil.
USE OF HUMOR: The instructor frequently employs humor
to lighten the mood as well as to illustrate points, add color
and make learning fun. This should in no way be interpreted as
disparaging any individual or group. Students will always be
treated with the utmost respect and will never be mocked or
ridiculed.
CONCERNS: I want this class to be a positive learning
experience for you. If, at any time, you have a concern,
grievance or complaint about the course,
please speak with
me about it directly in office hours or via Moodle
message. You have my personal guarantee that I will hear you
out, reflect carefully on what you have to say and that it
will have no bearing on your grade. Because the class uses
objective testing (with a record of scores on the server), you
have additional protection. My only request is that, if I have
some feedback for you, you consider it in the same spirit. I'd
rather correct any problems than have you be disgruntled for
the rest of the term (which is likely to negatively affect
your performance in the class) only to complain about it in
student evaluations. Why not alert me to a problem when I can
actually do something about it? In the unlikely event that you
remain dissatisfied, you can still take your concerns to the
Dean of the
Social
Science Division. I am a reasonable, fair and kind human
being and care about my students, so I'm sure we will be able
to work something out. The Dean's first suggestion will
probably be that the three of us meeting to discuss the issue.
He is a busy man doing important work for the college. Why not
see if we can work things out between us first? Addressing any
concerns early, honestly and directly will result in a better
outcome for both of us.
WHAT PHILOSOPHY IS: Philosophy
is the attempt to come to a systematic understanding
of the objective world through the use of reason. The
philosophical approach assumes a commitment to follow
the truth wherever it leads, however uncomfortable it
may make us and in spite of what we may wish to be
true. It strives for logical consistency and agreement
with the empirical evidence. Philosophy is about
asking questions, especially questions no one else
wants to ask. Philosophy even questions the
unquestionable, including things considered to be
"common sense," such as the existence of an external
world of matter, free will, God, the soul, an
afterlife, or, in the case of this class, the
existence of universal, objective moral values (or
perhaps the unquestionable certainty of our age is the
dogma that morality is culturally relative or
completely subjective). Philosophy uses conceptual
analysis as its primary tool. Properly analyzing
concepts requires the rigorous definition of terms, so
the precise use of language is very important to
philosophers, or at least to the good ones. This goes
all the way back to Socrates. Fuzzy language evinces
fuzzy thinking.
WHAT PHILOSOPHY IS NOT: Philosophy is not
about exploring your "personal beliefs." Nor is it
about your feelings, as reality is not based on your
subjective emotional state. Philosophy is not about
your identity, your sex, your gender, your sexual
orientation, your culture or your "
race."
It's not about your faith or "how you were raised."
Avoid
thinking in these terms and using subjective
phrases like "personally" and "in my personal
opinion" when doing philosophy. Philosophy (and
indeed all academic discourse) is about your
impersonal
opinion, i.e. your opinion backed by reasons and
evidence. Although there is an historical tradition
associated with philosophy, it is not primarily about
history, and even though understanding their
historical or cultural context may help us understand
the ideas of particular philosophers, it is
the
ideas themselves with which philosophy is
concerned.
CONTRIBUTIONS OF WOMEN AND NON-WESTERN
CULTURES: There were few women philosophers
until the beginning of the feminist movement in the
19th century. This was true of most other academic
fields due to the institutionalization of pre-modern
gender roles. Because this is a survey class concerned
with major historical figures and basic concepts in
ethics, we won't be reading many women philosophers.
This should in no way be seen as casting aspersions on
women as a class of people. We will, however, be
spending a significant amount of time with Ayn Rand,
who happens to be a woman and also one of the most
important and influential philosophers and
intellectuals of the 20th century, especially in
ethics and political philosophy.
Along those same lines, for various complex historical
and cultural reasons, philosophy emerged and
flourished in the West and is the heritage of Western
Civilization. It uniquely sowed the seeds for the
scientific and industrial revolutions in Western
Europe, leading to our modern technological world, as
well as providing the social and political concepts on
which the United States was founded. Like the
scientific method and industrial production
techniques, Western concepts such as individual
rights, separation of Church and State, democratic
self-government, meritocracy and free market
capitalism have been adopted by many non-Western
societies and diffused throughout the world. This is
yet another reason to focus on theories of value that
arose from and influenced the development of the
Western world and, consequently, the rest of human
civilization. The ethical traditions of other
civilizations, including indigenous cultures, are
covered extensively in history, cultural anthropology
and ethnic studies courses.
Finally, it is important to understand that "Western"
is just a conventional term for ideas which first
emerged in Western Europe. An idea's place of origin
or the particulars of the person who first developed
or expounded it has nothing whatever to do with its
truth value or importance in increasing human
understanding. Newton and Leibniz discovered calculus
around the same time and each accused the other of
stealing his discovery. Yet calculus is neither
essentially a British idea nor a German idea, nor is
it a European or "white male" idea. Who was first to
discover it, where he lived and the details of his
ancestry and nationality are irrelevant to the
validity and usefulness of calculus. So it is with all
intellectual discoveries and theoretical innovations,
including those concerning moral value.
CATALOG DESCRIPTION: Ethics is the study of
morality, including an analysis of the concepts of
good and evil, right and wrong, justice,
responsibility, duty, character and successful living.
Topics include whether morality is relative to culture
or to the individual, moral skepticism, the
relationship between morality and religion, theories
about what makes particular actions right or wrong,
the source of moral knowledge and how morality affects
the way we approach controversial social issues.
COURSE OBJECTIVES: The
objectives for this course are for students to (1)
come to a clearer understanding of ethical concepts
through the study of classical and contemporary
theories, (2) acquire some factual knowledge about the
history of ethics and important ethical thinkers, (3)
come to their own conclusions about which ethical
theories are best or most likely to be true, even if
those conclusions are of a tentative nature, (4)
acquire critical and analytical reasoning skills along
the way, and (5) apply conclusions about the nature of
moral value to their present way of life.
COURSE REQUIREMENTS
FORUM
POSTS
|
Weeks
1-10: Due before Sunday 11:59pm
|
20%
of grade
|
FIRST
MIDTERM EXAM |
Opens: Monday, October 19 at 9am
Closes: Monday, October 26 at 11:59pm |
20% of grade
|
SECOND
MIDTERM EXAM
|
Opens:
Monday, November 9 at 9am
Closes: Monday, November 16 at 11:59pm |
20%
of grade |
COMPREHENSIVE
MIDTERM
|
Opens:
Tuesday, November 17 at 9am
Closes: Monday, November 30 at 11:59pm |
20%
of grade
|
FINAL EXAM |
Opens: Thursday, December 3
at 9am
Closes: Thursday, December 10 at
11:59pm
|
20% of grade
|
READING: It is important to read the
material in order to perform well on exams and
online forums.
AUDIO PODCASTS: In addition to written text in
Moodle, this class uses audio podcasts from a previous
term's face-to-face class. Make sure to listen to
these each week, as they will explain the readings,
whiteboard notes and Powerpoint slides in Moodle.
There may be material on the exams which is contained
in these recordings but not explicitly stated in the
text. Feel free to skip over any announcements at the
beginning of the recordings. Any current announcements
will be posted to the Announcement Forum or Social
Forum.
FORUM POSTS: The purpose of the forum
assignment is to allow you the opportunity to
interpret, evaluate and apply what you have learned,
and to discuss the merits and implications of class
concepts and theories with your classmates. It
emphasizes
peer-to-peer learning in which you
learn from your fellow students. Every Monday a new
forum prompt will be posted. To receive full credit
for the forum, you must make two posts,
one
original post and one reply to another
student, of
100 to 300 words. Most
weeks there will be multiple topics from which to
choose. Your original post and reply can be two
different topics. You do
not have to make an
original post or reply to every topic.
You just
need one original post and one reply to the forum
for the week and before the deadline.
Since I am using set topics and prompts, an "original
post" is defined as a post which responds directly to
the prompt. To make an original post, click the
"reply" link in the prompt. To reply to another
student, click the reply link in that student's post.
Your post must substantially and directly address the
prompt and displays a familiarity with the reading,
i.e.
your post must be distinguishable from
someone who hasn't done any of the reading, looks at
the prompt and "gives their opinion."
Avoid
all titles, headers, greetings and signatures.
Moodle displays your name, the date, the topic and the
forum week; duplicating this information clutters up
the forum. When replying to another student, you can
include that student's first name in your reply. Write
in
block format with no indenting,
single-spaced with spacing between paragraphs, and
using
the default font. It is recommended that you
compose your post in
Google Docs or
Word (or similar word-processor) and check the word
count by choosing Tools --> Word Count. This will
also prevent your post being lost in case of a
connection error in Moodle. If you're pasting from
Google docs, Microsoft Word or similar programs, you
may need to
save as plain text first. After
you've posted,
make sure that your post's
formatting looks OK, that
the font size
and type matches everyone else's and that
there are
no extra spaces above or below the
text (a common problem with copying and pasting).
Your
post formatting must look exactly like the prompt.
Formatting errors will be penalized. See
the
Student
Help Desk for help using Moodle forums.
Read the prompt carefully before answering. Be
careful about misinterpreting or misunderstanding the
question or wandering into irrelevant biographical
information or personal anecdotes unless you're
absolutely sure they apply to the subject. The
inclusion of irrelevant material a.k.a. "going off on
tangents" may result in no credit. Posts which do not
directly address the prompt will not receive credit.
When replying to another student, make sure that
student's post is not off-topic or you may not receive
credit for your reply.
Support your answer with
examples that demonstrate your understanding of the
concepts being discussed, and present arguments to
support your claims. If you have trouble coming
up with 100 words, you probably need to include an
examples to clarify your claim or an arguments in
support of it.
It is up to you to convince me
that you understand the material, not up
to me to try to wring some modicum of comprehension
out of vaguely worded assertions without examples or
illustrations or to try to figure out whether what you
say could be reasonably construed as an "argument." If
you receive no credit and tell me what you
meant
by your post was such and such, I will tell you that
then you should have written
that.
You will have 30 minutes to edit your post. Moodle
will display your word count; make sure it is over 100
but under 300 words. Carefully
revise and
proofread your post for typos, awkward language,
conceptual vagueness and inconsistency.
Posts
making unsupported or contradictory claims will be
penalized. Your post should not
read like a stream of consciousness of you trying to
figure things out "on the fly." It should
not
be a series of disjointed observations. If it helps
you to write something like that first, go ahead, but
then revise it into a clear, methodical and coherent
argument. Avoid meaningless, introductory throw-away
comments or restating the question; get straight to
the point. If you pad your post with meaningless fluff
at the beginning, you may no receive credit for
insufficient word count. Be concise.
The first week gives an overview of ethics and the
moves on to the theory of
moral relativism.
Next, we will move on to moral skepticism and then
examine several absolutist theories of morality.
After
the first week has concluded and we have moved on to
other theories, posts which invoke relativism will
receive no credit. This includes statements such
as "everyone has their own morals" or "every culture
has its own version of morality."
Any statement
implying that morality is relative to culture or the
individual when analyzing moral skepticism or
any subsequent absolutist theories
will be
considered off-topic and result in no credit. From
Week Two on, you are to treat moral truths, if they
exist at all, as universal and objective.
Plagiarism, which includes but is not limited to
copying and pasting from websites, will result in a
penalty of one letter grade on the first offense (10%
of your course grade)
and an F in the course on
the second offense. If you do the readings, you
should have no trouble responding to the prompt in a
way that is sufficient for credit without looking at
any other sources.
Postings will be awarded a grade of "2" (full credit),
"1"(partial credit) or "0" (no credit) and are due
before Sunday 11:59 pm
at the end of each week. Make sure you have
at
least one original post and one reply to another
student for full credit. You can post as many
times as you like, but the maximum credit for each
weekly forum is 4 points. Each forum is worth 2% of
your grade, totaling 20% by the end of the term.
Please note that I have the gradebook set to ignore
empty grades. Therefore, if you miss a forum post, it
won't show up in your grade until the end of the term
when I will turn that setting off. I have that setting
on to give you an accurate assessment of your grade
throughout the term,
assuming you complete the
assignments.
Late posts will not
receive credit. Set a weekly reminder in your phone
or online calendar so you don't forget to post
(while you're at it, you might want to put in the exam
dates and grade option/drop deadline, too).
Posts
of fewer than 100 words will receive no credit. If
your post is over 300 words,
edit it down.
Posts
of over 300 words will be penalized. There will
be an Extra Credit Forum in Week Ten to make up for
two missed or no-credit original posts or replies.
EXAMS: The
exam format will be multiple choice and true/false
questions.
The final will not be
comprehensive.
Each
exam has a study guide linked in Moodle. Read the
questions and make sure you can answer each of them.
You may even want to write out the answers, which you
can consult while taking the exam. If you don't know
the answer to a particular question, search the
relevant section of the online textbook, the
Powerpoints, whiteboard captures and your notes from
the audio podcasts for the answer. If you are still
unsure or have questions about the reading or
podcasts, attend the Zoom tutoring hours listed above.
Even if you don't have any particular questions, you
are encouraged to attend Zoom tutoring hours for help
in doing your very best on the exams. Also, make sure
to take the short practice quizzes each week.
Once you take the exam, you will immediately receive
your score. If you would like to review the questions
you got wrong, visit the Philosophy Tutor's Zoom
Office Hours.
Reviewing which questions you
got wrong on the first two midterm exams will be
helpful to you when you take the Comprehensive Midterm
Exam, which will cover the same material.
The lowest of your three midterm exam scores
is automatically dropped (note that this does not
include the Final Exam). This means that
even if you get an F on the First Midterm Exam, you
can get some help with the class, figure out where you
went wrong, apply yourself, and possibly end up with
an A in the class.
You will have a week to take the First
and Second Midterm, a few more days for Comprehensive
Midterm and five days for Final Exam. Exams are taken
via Moodle with a time limit of one hour. The opening
and closing times of exams are listed in the table
above and in the course outline at the end of the
syllabus. Clicking on any exam in the main course view
in Moodle will also show you the opening and closing
dates as well as the chapters and weeks it covers.
EXAM DEADLINE POLICY:
Since you will have at least a week to take each
midterm, you will be expected to meet the deadline,
however, you may contact the Philosophy Tutor, listed
at the top of this syllabus, by Moodle message (
not
email) to request an extension without penalty.
Please
include the class, the exam
and the date you would like it extended to
in your message. If you miss the deadline for the
Final due to some unforeseen circumstance or emergency
situation, contact the instructor via Moodle message
for options ASAP.
Since I have the gradebook set to ignore empty grades,
if you miss an exam, just like a missed forum post,
you won't see the effect on your grade until the end
of the term when I turn that setting off. If you got
an 80% on the First Midterm but that's the only exam
you take, the gradebook might tell you that you have a
80 in the course, or even an 84% if you didn't do any
forum posts either, but your grade would be 16%, an F.
Again, Moodle will tell you your grade
based on
the assignments completed so far. Anything you
don't complete will be converted to a zero at the end
of the term. Make sure to complete all of the exams by
the deadlines!
GRADING:
There is no curve. At the end of the term, the class
will be graded on the following absolute scale, with
course totals rounded up to the nearest
whole number:
A+ 97% -100% |
A 93% - 96%
|
A- 90% - 92% |
B+ 87% - 89% |
B 83% - 86% |
B- 80% - 82% |
C+ 77% - 79% |
C 73% - 76% |
C- 70% - 72% |
D+ 67% - 69% |
D 63% - 66% |
D- 60% - 62% |
|
F 0% - 59% |
|
GETTING
HELP WITH THE CLASS: If you are having
difficulties with the class, please see the Philosophy
Tutor as soon as possible. The
tutor's Zoom office hours are at the top of this syllabus
and linked near the top of the main course page in Moodle.
The tutor can go over your exam with you and help you to
improve your grade on the next one as well as on the
Comprehensive Midterm Exam. If you have questions about
basic concepts or the study questions, please see the tutor
before seeing the instructor. You can earn extra credit for
each tutor visit of at least half an hour, up to a total of
three.
EARLY OUTREACH AND REFERRAL (EOR) PROGRAM: At Lane
Community College, we want every student to be successful.
The Early
Outreach and Referral (EOR) Program is a campus-wide
effort to support students early in the term when they first
begin experiencing difficulty in a class. If I see you are
having difficulty in this class (ex. missing classes,
missing assignments, and/or receiving low test or assignment
scores) I may refer you to our Early Outreach Specialist.
Once referred, the Early Outreach Specialist will follow up
with you by phone or email to find out how to best support
you by connecting you with necessary resources and helping
you develop and implement a success plan, which may include
individual tutoring or other services. Please respond to
these messages. Our current specialist, Mike Walker is
really nice, a good listener and has helped many struggling
students to succeed. If he contacts you, let him help.
ADVANCED QUESTIONS: If you have a particular issue
from the readings, audio podcasts or PowerPoints which you
would like to explore, discuss or perhaps debate in more
depth than is practical in Moodle messages, please visit me
during my zoom office hours. I am also happy to help clear
up any questions you may still have after seeing the tutor
first.
TECHNOLOGY
USE AND HELP: This is an online course.
It requires you to use (but not necessarily own) a
computer, laptop, netbook or tablet or smart phone with access to the
internet. Laptop
and Chromebook loans are available through the Student
Help Desk (SHeD). The
syllabus, schedule, announcements, supplementary
material and resources, quizzes, exams and grades
are all distributed via Moodle. Contact
the Student
Help Desk (SHeD) or call them at 463-3333 for
assistance with all of your technology-related
questions.