PHL 205 - CONTEMPORARY MORAL ISSUES
FINAL EXAM REVIEW
SPRING 2013
The Final Exam is
NOT optional. It is a course requirement. Unless you take all
four
exams, your lowest score will NOT be dropped and a "0" will be figured
into your course grade. The Final must be taken at the Social Science
Computer Testing Lab, Cottage Grove Center or with approved proctor
during Final Exam Week beginning Monday at 8am and ending THURSDAY at
5pm. THIS IS A HARD DEADLINE; the main campus testing lab closes for
the term at that time and I will be figuring course grades beginning
Thursday evening. As with previous exams, a 3 x 5 card of notes is
allowed.
ANIMAL RIGHTS
What's the difference between a vegetarian and a vegan? What is
a
"lacto-ovo" vegetarian? What sort of diet did human beings evolve to
eat? In other words, what sort of diet does it appear we were
"designed" to eat: herbivore, carnivore or omnivore? Are there any
health risks associated with eating meat, particularly the amount of
meat in the typical American diet? How does the health of the typical
vegetarian or vegan compare to the health of the typical meat eater?
According to evidence presented in class, can a person get all the
nutrition they need to be healthy without eating meat? What nutritional
deficits if any, are there in a vegan diet?
How are the animals used to produce the meat you buy in a
supermarket or eat in a restaurant typically treated? Are there any
arguments against eating "free range" animals which are treated
humanely? How does meat-eating affect the environment and consumption
of natural resources? What is the alien analogy? What is the pet
analogy? What is speciesism? What are some of the arguments presented
in Peter Singer's article "All Animals Are Equal?" What does he mean by
the moral principle of "equal consideration of interests"? What are
some arguments are there in favor of eating meat discussed in class or
in handouts? How might one respond to the argument that animals eat
each other, therefore it’s OK for us to eat them? What response could
one make to the argument that it’s natural for human beings to eat
meat, therefore it is morally permissible?